hurm...kt dlm dunia ni..walau dh nk masuk tahun 2010 still org membeza2kn darjat.. dlm course yg aqu amek pown same..dr part 1 dh lecturer ajar soh membeza2kn darjat bet. arkitek n consultant2 laen..
so..ist it really matter??bg aqu sume penting.. klu juz ade akitek je..xde pekerja buruh yg nk bina tu..korg yg akitek2 ni rase bgnan yg korg sebok conteng atas kertas tu terbinakah??so, plzla bakal akitek2 yg bertauliah yg akan memegang tittle akitek..tlg jgn nk bermegah diri...
i like to b an architect but not that kind of architect...stubborn..ingat kau dh jd akitek kau ibarat org tua mkn garam dulu??? every human made mistake..so klu salah..should u deny it bcoz u r boss or bcoz u r an architect??hurm...
dhla stubborn, snobbish plak tu..ingt kau seorg saje blh dsgn??n adekah dgn design kau lyak nk rendah2kn org laen??hurm...aqu rase bf aqu yg QS tu xjd QSpon tp buat bisnes sendiri income lg masyuk dr kau akitek yg berlagak...
klu stkt akitek BIASA yg xberpgkat AR nk bangga..its like ur design is beter than anything...BUT bila salah xnk amek responsibility on that cause..should u called urself as an architect..memalukan jer standard akitek yg vouge lg termasyhur dgn adab dn kesopanan...
for me la kan..design, idea n concept is unlimited..everyone had their own perception..so kita xde hak nk kondem design org semata2 kita xsuke...itu dinamakan akitek yg xlulus actuaLLY.insa yg xfhm ape itu senibina...namepon seni...its wordless...xde perkataan yg blh describekn seni itu...same ade ianya interesing or tdak jer...
kita berhak nk komen tp xperlu nk mengangkat design diri sendiri kata ianya lg bgs dr dsgn org laen.SHAME ON YOU.